Automatic 3D Facial Expression Analysis in Videos
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In later years various ways of dynamic representation were explored.
“In later years various ways of dynamic representation were also explored like tracking geometrical deformations across frames in RGB [114], [116] and 3D [119], [128] or directly extracting features from RGB [127] and thermal frame sequences [196], [210].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [119]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Chang, Y., Vieira, M., Turk, M., & Velho, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (BR)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 293-307
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1568068040
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
- Keywords
- facial expression recognition, facial expression editing, Lipschitz embeddings, 3D video, facial expression synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
