Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,628

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge

Dagan, Ido, Glickman, Oren, Magnini, Bernardo·2006·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/11736790_9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bacchus, F.: Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
  2. Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Glickman, O.: Definition and Analysis of Intermediate Entailment Levels. In: ACL 2005 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment (2005) · doi:10.3115/1631862.1631872
  3. Chierchia, G., McConnell-Ginet, S.: Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
  4. Condoravdi, C., Crouch, D., de Paiva, V., Stolle, R., Bobrow, D.G.: Entailment, intensionality and text understanding. In: HLT-NAACL Workshop on Text Meaning (2003) · DOI
  5. Corley, C., Mihalcea, R.: Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Texts. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor, June 2005, 1318 pages (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dagan, I., Glickman, O.: Probabilistic Textual Entailment: Generic Applied Modeling of Language Variability. In: PASCAL workshop on Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining, Grenoble, France, January 26- 29 (2004)
  7. Glickman, O., Dagan, I., Koppel, M.: A Lexical Alignment Model for Probabilistic Textual Entailment. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., et al. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 287–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
  8. Halpern, J.Y.: An analysis of first-order logics of probability. Artificial Intelligence 46, 311–350 (1990) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Keefe, R., Smith, P. (eds.): Vagueness: A Reader. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
  10. Lukasiewicz, J.: Selected Works. In: Borkowski, L. (ed.). North Holland, London (1970)
  11. Marsi, E., Krahmer, E.: Classification of Semantic Relations by Humans and Machines. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment (2005) · doi:10.3115/1631862.1631863
  12. Monz, C., de Rijke, M.: Light-Weight Entailment Checking for Computational Semantics. In: The third workshop on inference in computational semantics, ICoS-3 (2001)
  13. Vanderwende, L., Dolan, W.B.: What Syntax can Contribute in the Entailment Task. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., et al. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 205–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
  14. Szpektor, I., Tanev, H., Dagan, I., Coppola, B.: Scaling Web-based Acquisition of Entailment Relations. In: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2004)
  15. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (1965) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Zaenen, A., Karttunen, L., Crouch, R.: Local Textual Inference: Can it be Defined or Circumscribed? In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment (2005) · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,628

Metadata

Authors
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2006
Pages
177-190
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2130158090
Cited by
1,628
References
2
FWCI
57.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11736790_9
The paper
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B. (2006). The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736790_9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.