Feature Selection and Activity Recognition from Wearable Sensors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FDA regulations do not distinguish between platforms or device size, but focus on the medical function and intended use.
“FDA regulations do not distinguish between platforms or device size, but focuses on the medical function and intended use.223”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [223]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 229
- Authors
- Pirttikangas, S., Fujinami, K., & Nakajima, T.
- Affiliations
- Waseda University (JP)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 516-527
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1527911497
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Tekes
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- activity recognition, wearable sensors, feature selection, triaxial accelerometer, heart rate, k-nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
