Quantum Information
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some procedures have been proposed in the literature to derive Kraus operators from the underlying quantum Markovian master equation.
“Nonetheless, some procedures have been proposed in the literature [62, 63].”
From Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in Liouville space (2020) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in Liouville space
Gyamfi, J. A. (2020) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ab9fdd · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hayashi, M.
- Affiliations
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Masahito Hayashi
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W4256486907
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
