An Introduction to Computational Diffusion MRI: the Diffusion Tensor and Beyond
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tractography results are sensitive to the choice of the underlying fiber tracking algorithm, which can affect subsequent quantitative analyses using the tractography data.
“It is important to note that tractography is known to be sensitive to the choice of the underlying fiber tracking algorithms, which can further affect any subsequent quantitative analyses using the tractography data.”
From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Alexander, 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Alexander, D. C.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Alexander, Daniel C.
- ORCID
- Alexander, Daniel C.
- Venue
- Mathematics and Visualization
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 83-106
- ISSN
- 1612-3786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W16927157
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 32.86
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematics and visualization (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Keywords
- diffusion MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion spectrum imaging, tractography, microstructure characterization, particle motion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
