Cited by 1,334Advanced Database Systems and QueriesScientific Computing and Data ManagementSemantic Web and Ontologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance

Open access
Buneman, Peter, Khanna, Sanjeev, Wang-Chiew, Tan·2001·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-44503-x_20

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Buneman, P., Khanna, S., & Wang-Chiew, T.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2001
Pages
316-330
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552694902
Cited by
1,334
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 81
FWCI
9.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
data provenance, database views, relational databases, XML data, hierarchical data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review