Cited by 213Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsTactile and Sensory InteractionsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Haptic feedback: a brief history from telepresence to virtual reality

Stone, Robert J.·2001·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-44589-7_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manipulation can be improved by adding tactile feedback, which can result in better performance.

    “manipulation can be improved by adding tactile feedback [1], [35], [36] that can result in better performance [37].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, R. J.
Corresponding author
Stone, Robert J.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2001
Pages
1-16
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1535609573
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
27.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
haptic feedback, telepresence, telerobots, virtual reality, haptic devices, 3D visual simulation, aerospace, surgical applications, military applications, non-expert users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review