Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Similarity vs. Diversity

Smyth, Barry, McClave, Paul·2001·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bergmann, R., Richter, M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A. and Vollrath, I.: Utility-SOriented Matching: A New Research Direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, 2001.
  2. Burke, R.: Conceptual Indexing and Active Retrieval of Video for Interactive Learning Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(8):491–499, 1996. · DOI
  3. Burke, R.: A case-based approach to collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer-Verlag, 2000. · DOI
  4. Faltings, B.: Probabilistic Indexing for Case-Based Prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 611–622. Springer-Verlag, 1997. · DOI
  5. S. Fox, S. and Leake, D. B.: Using Introspective Reasoning to Refine Indexing. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 391–397. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
  6. Kolodner, J.: Judging which is the “best” case for a case-based reasoner. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 77–81. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.
  7. Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Konstan, J.A., Miller, B.N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J.L., Gorgan, L.R., and J. Riedl.: GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77–87, 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Leake, D. B.: Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences,Lessons and Future Directions. AAAI/MIT Press, 1996.
  10. Leake, D. B.: Constructive Similarity Assessment: Using Stored Cases to Define New Situations. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 313–318. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1992.
  11. Smyth, B. and Cotter, P.: A Personalized TV Listings Service for the Digital TV Age. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(2-3):53–59, 2000. · DOI
  12. Smyth, B.: and Keane, M.: Adaptation-Guided Retrieval: Questioning the Similarity Assumption in Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 102:249–293, 1998. · DOI
  13. Smyth, B.: and McKenna, E.: Incremental Footprint-Based Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 21st SGES International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, pages 89–101. Springer Verlag, 2000.

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Smyth, B., & McClave, P.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2001
Pages
347-361
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1774663064
Cited by
422
References
1
FWCI
5.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similarity vs. Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25
The paper
Smyth, B., & McClave, P. (2001). Similarity vs. Diversity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.