The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Web Structure, Dynamics and Page Quality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, the results show that the web is constantly changing mainly due to the creation of more and more new pages and, to a lesser extent, the modification of the content of existing ones.
“Overall, the results show that the web is constantly changing mainly due to the creation of more and more new pages and, to a lesser extent, the modification of the content of existing ones.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Baeza-Yates et al. 2002
In its traditional form, the PageRank algorithm fails to promote newly created relevant web pages because acquiring links usually requires considerable time.
“In its traditional form, the PageRank algorithm fails to promote newly created relevant web pages because acquiring links usually requires considerable time.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Baeza-Yates et al. 2002
Baeza-Yates et al. 2002 demonstrated the temporal bias of PageRank.
“who demonstrated the temporal bias of PageRank.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Baeza-Yates et al. 2002
Cho et al. 2005 relied on web link structure evolution to propose a new ranking metric to solve the problem pointed out by Baeza-Yates et al. 2002.
“[Cho et al. 2005] relied on web link structure, especially its evolution, to propose a new ranking metric to solve the problem pointed out by [Baeza-Yates et al. 2002]”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Baeza-Yates et al. 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Baeza-Yates, R., AND Castillo, C. Relating web characteristics with link analysis. In String Processing and Information Retrieval (2001), IEEE Computer Science Press. · DOI
- Brewington, B., Cybenko, G., Stata, R., Bharat, K., AND Maghoul, F. How dynamic is the web? In 9th World Wide Web Conference (2000). · DOI
- Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., AND Tomkins, A. Graph structure in the Web: Experiments and models. In 9th World Wide Web Conference (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- Cho, J., AND Garcia-Molina, H. The evolution of the Web and implications for an incremental crawler. In The VLDB Journal (2000).
- Douglas, F., Feldmann, A., Krishnamurthy, B., AND Mogul, J. Rate of change and other metrics: a live study of the World Wide Web. In USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (1997).
- Kleinberg, J. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In 9th Symposium on discrete algorithms (1998).
- Levene, M., AND Poulovassilis, A. Report on International Workshop on Web Dynamics, London, January 2001. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Baeza-Yates, R., Saint-Jean, F., & Castillo, C.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 117-130
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
