When and Why Does Mastery Learning Work: Instructional Experiments with ACT-R “SimStudents”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Providing and eliciting explanations may be critical to help learners break down or externalize the complex inference needed when processing negative feedback to fully identify all the KCs and integrative KCs in a reasoning chain and to revise any KCs that are not correct as part of that chain.
“Providing and eliciting explanations may be critical to help learners break down or externalize the complex inference needed when processing negative feedback to fully identify all the KCs and integrative KCs in a reasoning chain and to revise any KCs that are not correct as part of that chain (cf.MacLaren & Koedinger, 2002).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as MacLaren & Koedinger, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Self-citationLayered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods
Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S., & Masthoff, J. (2010) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-010-9082-4 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacLaren, B., & Koedinger, K.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Koedinger, Kenneth
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 355-366
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136070270
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- learning mastery, simulated students, instructional design, skill decomposition, verbal problem solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
