Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond the desk top metaphor: Information retrieval with an icon-based interface

Pejtersen, Annelise Mark, Goodstein, L. P.·1990·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-52698-6_10

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pejtersen, Annelise Mark and Rasmussen, Jens: Information Retrieval in Integrated Work Stations. Paper presented at the Second ICAK Conference, Japan, November 1987. To be published in the proceedings: Information and Knowledge, Tokyo 1988.

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
1990
Pages
149-182
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2117911400
Cited by
4
References
5
FWCI
2.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
information retrieval, icon-based interface, graphical user interface, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the desk top metaphor: Information retrieval with an icon-based interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-52698-6_10
The paper
Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1990). Beyond the desk top metaphor: Information retrieval with an icon-based interface. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52698-6_10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.