The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valuation of trust in open networks
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks
Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser, M. T., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2003) · Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '03 · doi:10.1145/775152.775242 · Cited by 3,362
Abdul-Rahman, A., & Hailes, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the 1997 workshop on New security paradigms - NSPW '97 · doi:10.1145/283699.283739 · Cited by 699
Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity
Ziegler, C.-N., & Golbeck, J. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.003 · Cited by 377
Propagation Models for Trust and Distrust in Social Networks
Ziegler, C.-N., & Lausen, G. (2005) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-005-4807-3 · Cited by 340
Spreading activation models for trust propagation
Ziegler, C.-N., & Lausen, G. (2004) · IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, 2004. EEE '04. 2004 · doi:10.1109/eee.2004.1287293 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Beth, T., Borcherding, M., & Klein, B.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1505128236
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuation of trust in open networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-58618-0_53
- The paper
- Beth, T., Borcherding, M., & Klein, B. (1994). Valuation of trust in open networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58618-0_53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
