The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scratch Wound Healing Assay
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research Techniques Made Simple: Analysis of Collective Cell Migration Using the Wound Healing Assay
Grada, A., Otero-Vinas, M., Prieto-Castrillo, F., Obagi, Z., & Falanga, V. (2017) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.020 · Cited by 777
Wound healing properties of jojoba liquid wax: An in vitro study
Ranzato, E., Martinotti, S., & Burlando, B. (2011) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.12.042 · Cited by 150
Self-citationSheet migration by wounded monolayers as an emergent property of single-cell dynamics
Bindschadler, M., & McGrath, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.03395 · Cited by 132
Honeydew honey: biological effects on skin cells
Martinotti, S., Calabrese, G., & Ranzato, E. (2017) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/s11010-017-3067-0 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinotti, S., & Ranzato, E.
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 2109
- Pages
- 225-229
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W2967189612
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 74.80
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scratch Wound Healing Assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/7651_2019_259
- The paper
- Martinotti, S., & Ranzato, E. (2019). Scratch Wound Healing Assay. Methods in Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2019_259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
