Functional neuroanatomy of anxiety: a neural circuit perspective
Abstract
Anxiety is a commonly experienced subjective state that can have both adaptive and maladaptive properties. Clinical disorders of anxiety are likewise also common, and range widely in their symptomatology and consequences for the individual. Cognitive neuroscience has provided an increasingly sophisticated understanding of the processes underlying normal human emotion, and its disruption or dysregulation in clinical anxiety disorders. In this chapter, I review functional neuroimaging studies of emotion in healthy and anxiety-disordered populations. A limbic-medial prefrontal circuit is emphasized and an information processing model is proposed for the processing of negative emotion. Data on negative emotion processing in a variety of anxiety disorders are presented and integrated within an understanding of the functions of elements within the limbic-medial prefrontal circuit. These data suggest that anxiety disorders may be usefully conceptualized as differentially affecting emotional reactivity and regulatory processes--functions that involve different neurobiological mechanisms. While the neural bases of several anxiety disorders are increasingly better understood, advances have lagged significantly behind in others. Nonetheless, the conceptual framework provided by convergent findings in studies of emotional processing in normative and anxiety-disordered populations promises to yield continued insights and nuances, and will likely provide useful information in the search fo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functional neuroimaging studies typically show an imbalance in neural activation in patients with anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls, with abnormally elevated limbic activation not adequately controlled by prefrontal regions.
“Functional neuroimaging studies (using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) scanning) typically demonstrate an imbalance in neural activation in patients with anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls whereby abnormally elevated limbic activation is not adequately controlled by prefrontal regions (Etkin”
From Meta-analyses of the neural mechanisms and predictors of response to psychotherapy in depression and anxiety (2018) · cites this paper as Etkin, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 227
- Authors
- Etkin, A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Etkin, Amit
- ORCID
- Etkin, Amit
- Venue
- Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 251-277
- ISSN
- 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-3389
- OpenAlex
- W1527084800
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 38.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- anxiety, anxiety disorders, functional neuroanatomy, negative emotion processing, emotional reactivity, emotion regulation, neural circuit model, information processing model
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Emotions, Hippocampus, Humans, Limbic System, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Phobic Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Panic Disorder, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review