Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Methods for the Assessment of Metabolic Functions in the Diseased Brain
Abstract
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to detect and quantify multiple metabolites. This chapter will review some of the applications of MRS to the study of brain functions. Typically, (1)H-MRS can detect metabolites reflecting neuronal density and integrity, markers of energy metabolism or inflammation, as well as neurotransmitters. The complexity of the proton spectrum has however led to the development of other nuclei-based methods, such as (31)P- and (13)C-MRS, which offer a broader chemical shift range and therefore can provide more detailed information at the level of single metabolites. The versatility of MRS allows for a wide range of clinical applications, of which neurodegeneration is an interesting target for spectroscopy-based studies. In particular, MRS can identify patterns of altered brain chemistry in Alzheimer's patients and can help establish differential diagnosis in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Using MRS to follow less abundant neurotransmitters is currently out of reach and will most likely depend on the development of methods such as hyperpolarization that can increase the sensitivity of detection. In particular, dynamic nuclear polarization has opened up a new and exciting area of medical research, with developments that could greatly impact on the real-time monitoring of in vivo metabolic processes in the brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ESC+ chemistry employing glycol nucleic acid in the antisense seed region for increased specificity retained activity in rat two weeks after a single 0.9 mg intrathecal dose.
“Furthermore, the ESC+ chemistry employing glycol nucleic acid (GNA) in the antisense seed region for increased speci city 10,30 retained activity in rat two weeks after a single 0.9 mg IT dose (Fig. 1d).”
From Expanding RNAi therapeutics to extrahepatic tissues with lipophilic conjugates (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 162 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Hall, H., Cuellar-Baena, S., Dahlberg, C., in’t Zandt, R., Denisov, V., & Kirik, D.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Hélène
- ORCID
- Kirik, Deniz
- Venue
- Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 169-198
- ISSN
- 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-3389
- OpenAlex
- W1709041852
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- magnetic resonance spectroscopy, brain metabolism, neurodegeneration, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, 1H NMR, phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy, neurotransmitters, energy metabolism, neuroinflammation, dynamic nuclear polarization, hyperpolarization, differential diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Aspartic Acid, Brain, Humans, Isotopes, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Parkinson Disease, Protons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review