Cited by 247Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Roles of "wanting" and "liking" in motivating behavior: gambling, food, and drug addictions

Robinson, M. J. F., Fischer, A. M., Ahuja, A., Lesser, E. N., Maniates, H.·2015·Current topics in behavioral neurosciences

Abstract

The motivation to seek out and consume rewards has evolutionarily been driven by the urge to fulfill physiological needs. However in a modern society dominated more by plenty than scarcity, we tend to think of motivation as fueled by the search for pleasure. Here, we argue that two separate but interconnected subcortical and unconscious processes direct motivation: "wanting" and "liking." These two psychological and neuronal processes and their related brain structures typically work together, but can become dissociated, particularly in cases of addiction. In drug addiction, for example, repeated consumption of addictive drugs sensitizes the mesolimbic dopamine system, the primary component of the "wanting" system, resulting in excessive "wanting" for drugs and their cues. This sensitizing process is long-lasting and occurs independently of the "liking" system, which typically remains unchanged or may develop a blunted pleasure response to the drug. The result is excessive drug-taking despite minimal pleasure and intense cue-triggered craving that may promote relapse long after detoxification. Here, we describe the roles of "liking" and "wanting" in general motivation and review recent evidence for a dissociation of "liking" and "wanting" in drug addiction, known as the incentive sensitization theory (Robinson and Berridge 1993). We also make the case that sensitization of the "wanting" system and the resulting dissociation of "liking" and "wanting" occurs in both gambling disorder and food addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/7854_2015_387

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 197 · Cited by 247

Authors
Robinson, M. J. F., Fischer, A. M., Ahuja, A., Lesser, E. N., & Maniates, H.
Affiliations
Wesleyan University (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, M. J. F.
Venue
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Published
2015
Volume
27
Pages
105-136
ISSN
  • 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3389
OpenAlex
W1789225984
Cited by
247
References
197
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
44.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
wanting, liking, motivation, incentive sensitization, drug addiction, gambling addiction, food addiction, mesolimbic dopamine system, reward, craving, relapse
MeSH terms
Brain, Emotions, Food, Gambling, Humans, Hyperphagia, Motivation, Obesity, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review