Cited by 122Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Translational assessment of reward and motivational deficits in psychiatric disorders

Open access
Der-Avakian, Andre, Barnes, Samuel A., Markou, Athina, Pizzagalli, Diego A.·2015·Current topics in behavioral neurosciences

Abstract

Deficits in reward and motivation are common symptoms characterizing several psychiatric and neurological disorders. Such deficits may include anhedonia, defined as loss of pleasure, as well as impairments in anticipatory pleasure, reward valuation, motivation/effort, and reward learning. This chapter describes recent advances in the development of behavioral tasks used to assess different aspects of reward processing in both humans and non-human animals. While earlier tasks were generally developed independently with limited cross-species correspondence, a newer generation of translational tasks has emerged that are theoretically and procedurally analogous across species and allow parallel testing, data analyses, and interpretation between human and rodent behaviors. Such enhanced conformity between cross-species tasks will facilitate investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying discrete reward and motivated behaviors and is expected to improve our understanding and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by reward and motivation deficits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/7854_2015_5004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human studies mainly based on self-report lack comparability with animal behavioral tasks, and interpretation of animal data in human pathophysiology is challenging.

    “Studies in humans, which are mainly based on self-report questionnaires, lack adequate comparability with results gained from behavioral tasks in animals. Furthermore, interpretation of animal data in the context of human pathophysiology is often challenging (Der-Avakian et al., 2016).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Der-Avakian et al., 2016

  • Different transmitter systems might mediate different domains of reward, with consummatory pleasure linked to the opioid and serotonergic system and anticipatory pleasure mainly to dopaminergic mechanisms.

    “It has been suggested that different transmitter systems might mediate different domains of reward, with consummatory pleasure being linked to the opioid and serotonergic system and anticipatory pleasure mainly to dopaminergic mechanisms (Barbano and Cador, 2007; Der-Avakian et al., 2016).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Der-Avakian et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 200 · Cited by 122

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Trecker A Robbins TW Mar AC Development of a Visual-guided Probabilistic Selection Task for Rats 2012 Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2012 Utrecht, The Netherlands August 28-31, 2012 Utrecht, The Netherlands

Authors
Der-Avakian, A., Barnes, S. A., Markou, A., & Pizzagalli, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Markou, Athina
  • Pizzagalli, Diego A.
Venue
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Published
2015
Volume
28
Pages
231-262
ISSN
  • 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3389
OpenAlex
W2256585861
Cited by
122
References
200
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
21.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Otsuka America
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101521, R01MH095809, R01MH068376, R01MH087989)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R56DA011946, R01DA011946)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
reward processing, motivational deficits, anhedonia, anticipatory pleasure, reward valuation, effort, reward learning, cross-species comparison, rodent models, neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Learning, Motivation, Reward, Translational Research, Biomedical, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review