Cited by 121Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Overview of human oxytocin research

Kendrick, Keith M., Guastella, Adam J., Becker, Benjamin·2017·Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences

Abstract

Social dysfunction is a core symptom of many psychiatric disorders and current medications have little or no remedial effects on this. Following on from extensive studies on animal models demonstrating that the neuropeptide oxytocin plays an important role in social recognition and bonding, human-based research has explored its therapeutic potential for social dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Here we outline the historical background of this human-based research and some of the current methodological challenges it is facing. To date, research has primarily attempted to establish functional effects through measuring altered endogenous concentrations, observing effects of exogenous administration and by investigating the effects of polymorphisms and epigenetic modifications of the oxytocin receptor gene. We summarize some of the key findings on behavioral and neural effects that have been reported in healthy subjects in the context of social cognition which have provided encouragement that oxytocin could represent a promising therapeutic target. At the same time, we have identified a number of key areas where we urgently need further information about optimal dosing strategies and interactions with other peptide and transmitter systems. Finally, we have summarized current translational findings, particularly in the context of therapeutic outcomes of intranasal oxytocin administration in autism and schizophrenia. These clinical findings while somewhat varied in outcome do offer increasing cause for optimism that targeting the oxytocin system may provide a successful therapeutic approach for social dysfunction. However, future research needs to focus on the most effective treatment strategy and which types of individuals are likely to benefit most.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/7854_2017_19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 189 · Cited by 121

Authors
Kendrick, K. M., Guastella, A. J., & Becker, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Kendrick, Keith M.
  • Guastella, Adam J.
  • Becker, Benjamin
Venue
Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
Published
2017
Volume
35
Pages
321-348
ISSN
  • 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3389
OpenAlex
W2752598420
Cited by
121
References
189
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
37.89
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, oxytocin receptor gene, social dysfunction, social cognition, mental illness, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, epigenetic modifications, endogenous oxytocin, therapeutic target, dosing regimen, translational research
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Autistic Disorder, Humans, Oxytocin, Schizophrenia, Social Behavior, Receptors, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review