The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Neuropsychology of Attention
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact much psychological research (Bargh and Chartrand, 1999; Chaiken and Trope, 1999; Cohen, 2014) demonstrates that even apparently rational thought processes are strongly influenced by emotional states.”
From Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen, 2014
In the citing paper
“recent writers (Porges, 2004; Cohen, 2014) have pointed out that emotionally charged and sudden situations are responded to very rapidly at a sub-cortical level, involving the amygdalar complex and the hippocampus, and not initially engaging the complex associative cortex with its capacity for reasoned decision.”
From Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen, 2014
Citations
Cites
Stimulus–Response Compatibility
(2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780849375477-202 · Cited by 58
Bundy, A., & Wallen, L. A. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-96868-6_58 · Cited by 25
Focused and Sustained Attention
Cohen, R. A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_6 · Cited by 20
Self-citationFunctional Neuroimaging of Attention
(2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3420.003.0007 · Cited by 18
The Orienting Response: Index of Attention
Cohen, R. A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_8 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coull, J. T. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00011-2 · Cited by 882
Attention and memory dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder.
Vasterling, J. J., Brailey, K., Constans, J. I., & Sutker, P. B. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.12.1.125 · Cited by 583
Vasterling, J. J., Duke, L. M., Brailey, K., Constans, J. I., Allain, A. N., & Sutker, P. B. (2002) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.16.1.5 · Cited by 556
Dedoncker, J., Brunoni, A. R., Baeken, C., & Vanderhasselt, M. (2016) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.006 · Cited by 555
A global assessment of phthalates burden and related links to health effects
Katsikantami, I., Sifakis, S., Tzatzarakis, M. N., Vakonaki, E., Kalantzi, O., Tsatsakis, A. M., & Rizos, A. K. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.013 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Ronald A.
- ORCID
- Cohen, Ronald A.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W2146934434
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Thammasat University Digital Collections (submittedVersion)
- TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) (submittedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- attention, executive function, attention deficits, attention assessment, pharmacotherapy, attention and consciousness, attention and memory, attention and awareness, attentional constraints, computational neuroscience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review