Cited by 205Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsPlant Reproductive Biology

The Application of Flow Cytometry for Estimating Genome Size, Ploidy Level Endopolyploidy, and Reproductive Modes in Plants

Pellicer, Jaume, Powell, Robyn F., Leitch, Ilia J.·2021·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Over the years, the amount of DNA in a nucleus (genome size) has been estimated using a variety of methods, but increasingly, flow cytometry (FCM) has become the method of choice. The popularity of this technique lies in the ease of sample preparation and in the large number of particles (i.e., nuclei) that can be analyzed in a very short period of time. This chapter presents a step-by-step guide to estimating the nuclear DNA content of plant nuclei using FCM. Attempting to serve as a tool for daily laboratory practice, we list, in detail, the equipment required, specific reagents and buffers needed, as well as the most frequently used protocols to carry out nuclei isolation. In addition, solutions to the most common problems that users may encounter when working with plant material and troubleshooting advice are provided. Finally, information about the correct terminology to use and the importance of obtaining chromosome counts to avoid cytological misinterpretations of the FCM data are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Flow cytometry allows precise counting of chromosomes and determination of ploidy and nuclear DNA content, providing a more sensitive, rapid, and reliable approach to detecting genetic variation.

    “This method allows for precisely counting chromosomes and determining ploidy and nuclear DNA content, providing a more sensitive, rapid, and reliable approach to detecting genetic variation [109].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 83 · Cited by 205

Authors
Pellicer, J., Powell, R. F., & Leitch, I. J.
Affiliations
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
Corresponding author
Pellicer, Jaume
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2020-12-11
Volume
2222
Pages
325-361
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W3113193260
Cited by
205
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
Keywords
genome size estimation, ploidy level, endopolyploidy, reproductive mode, plant nuclei, nuclear DNA content, nuclei isolation, chromosome number, flow cytometry protocol, plant cell biology
MeSH terms
Cell Fractionation, Cell Nucleus, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Dyes, Models, Biological, Plants, Polyploidy, Reproduction, Genome, Plant, Chromosomes, Plant, Genome Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review