The Application of Flow Cytometry for Estimating Genome Size, Ploidy Level Endopolyploidy, and Reproductive Modes in Plants
Abstract
Over the years, the amount of DNA in a nucleus (genome size) has been estimated using a variety of methods, but increasingly, flow cytometry (FCM) has become the method of choice. The popularity of this technique lies in the ease of sample preparation and in the large number of particles (i.e., nuclei) that can be analyzed in a very short period of time. This chapter presents a step-by-step guide to estimating the nuclear DNA content of plant nuclei using FCM. Attempting to serve as a tool for daily laboratory practice, we list, in detail, the equipment required, specific reagents and buffers needed, as well as the most frequently used protocols to carry out nuclei isolation. In addition, solutions to the most common problems that users may encounter when working with plant material and troubleshooting advice are provided. Finally, information about the correct terminology to use and the importance of obtaining chromosome counts to avoid cytological misinterpretations of the FCM data are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flow cytometry allows precise counting of chromosomes and determination of ploidy and nuclear DNA content, providing a more sensitive, rapid, and reliable approach to detecting genetic variation.
“This method allows for precisely counting chromosomes and determining ploidy and nuclear DNA content, providing a more sensitive, rapid, and reliable approach to detecting genetic variation [109].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [109]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 83 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Pellicer, J., Powell, R. F., & Leitch, I. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pellicer, Jaume
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2020-12-11
- Volume
- 2222
- Pages
- 325-361
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W3113193260
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
- Keywords
- genome size estimation, ploidy level, endopolyploidy, reproductive mode, plant nuclei, nuclear DNA content, nuclei isolation, chromosome number, flow cytometry protocol, plant cell biology
- MeSH terms
- Cell Fractionation, Cell Nucleus, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Dyes, Models, Biological, Plants, Polyploidy, Reproduction, Genome, Plant, Chromosomes, Plant, Genome Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review