Tools for efficient genome editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR
Abstract
The last two decades have marked significant advancement in the genome editing field. Three generations of programmable nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas system) have been adopted to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotic cells. DNA repair machinery of the cells has been exploited to introduce insertion and deletions (indels) at the targeted DSBs to study function of any gene-of-interest. The resulting indels were generally assumed to be "random" events produced by "error-prone" DNA repair pathways. However, recent advances in computational tools developed to study the Cas9-induced mutations have changed the consensus and implied the "non-randomness" nature of these mutations. Furthermore, CRISPR-centric tools are evolving at an unprecedented pace, for example, base- and prime-editors are the newest developments that have been added to the genome editing toolbox. Altogether, genome editing tools have revolutionized our way of conducting research in life sciences. Here, we present a concise overview of genome editing tools and describe the DNA repair pathways underlying the generation of genome editing outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ZFNs and TALENs depend on protein engineering of DNA-binding domains to recognize and edit specific DNA sequences.
“ZFNs and TALENs depend on protein engineering of DNA-binding domains to recognize and edit specific DNA sequences.”
From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Shamshirgaran et al., 2022
Truncated gRNA truncated by 2-3 bp at the 5' end decreases off-target effects.
“Truncated gRNA: truncated by 2-3bp at 5’ end | Decreased off-target effects”
From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Extended gRNA GGX20 decreases off-target effects.
“Extended gRNA: GGX20 | Decreased off-target effects”
From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 114
- Authors
- Shamshirgaran, Y., Liu, J., Sumer, H., Verma, P. J., & Taheri-Ghahfarokhi, A.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Agriculture Victoria (AU)
- South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Shamshirgaran, Yasaman
- Venue
- Methods in molecular biology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 2495
- Pages
- 29-46
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W4285132200
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 13
- FWCI
- 35.77
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- genome editing, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, CRISPR/Cas9, programmable nucleases, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA repair pathways, indels, base editors, prime editors, targeted mutagenesis
- MeSH terms
- Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases, Gene Editing, Endonucleases, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review