Cited by 114CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseDNA Repair Mechanisms

Tools for efficient genome editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR

Shamshirgaran, Yasaman, Liu, Jun, Sumer, Huseyin, Verma, Paul J., Taheri-Ghahfarokhi, Amir·2022·Methods in molecular biology

Abstract

The last two decades have marked significant advancement in the genome editing field. Three generations of programmable nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas system) have been adopted to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotic cells. DNA repair machinery of the cells has been exploited to introduce insertion and deletions (indels) at the targeted DSBs to study function of any gene-of-interest. The resulting indels were generally assumed to be "random" events produced by "error-prone" DNA repair pathways. However, recent advances in computational tools developed to study the Cas9-induced mutations have changed the consensus and implied the "non-randomness" nature of these mutations. Furthermore, CRISPR-centric tools are evolving at an unprecedented pace, for example, base- and prime-editors are the newest developments that have been added to the genome editing toolbox. Altogether, genome editing tools have revolutionized our way of conducting research in life sciences. Here, we present a concise overview of genome editing tools and describe the DNA repair pathways underlying the generation of genome editing outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-0716-2301-5_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZFNs and TALENs depend on protein engineering of DNA-binding domains to recognize and edit specific DNA sequences.

    “ZFNs and TALENs depend on protein engineering of DNA-binding domains to recognize and edit specific DNA sequences.”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Shamshirgaran et al., 2022

  • Truncated gRNA truncated by 2-3 bp at the 5' end decreases off-target effects.

    “Truncated gRNA: truncated by 2-3bp at 5’ end | Decreased off-target effects”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [75]

  • Extended gRNA GGX20 decreases off-target effects.

    “Extended gRNA: GGX20 | Decreased off-target effects”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [75]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 114

Authors
Shamshirgaran, Y., Liu, J., Sumer, H., Verma, P. J., & Taheri-Ghahfarokhi, A.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Agriculture Victoria (AU)
  • South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Shamshirgaran, Yasaman
Venue
Methods in molecular biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2022
Volume
2495
Pages
29-46
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W4285132200
Cited by
114
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 13
FWCI
35.77
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
genome editing, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, CRISPR/Cas9, programmable nucleases, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA repair pathways, indels, base editors, prime editors, targeted mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases, Gene Editing, Endonucleases, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review