Cited by 24Islamic Thought and Society StudiesQur’anic Interpretation StudiesIslamic Studies and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dreams and Dreaming in Islam

Hermansen, Marcia·2001·Dreams

Abstract

In my overview of approaches to dreams and dreaming in Islam, I focus primarily on hermeneutic questions about the practice of dream interpretation. As the passage cited above suggests, the idea that there is a factual meaning or indication to a dream is assumed in the tradition. However, the interpretive process, the contextualization of dream and dreamer, and the relation between them are all factors of successful exegesis. This is foundational in approaching Islamic understandings of dreams and dreaming.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-137-08545-0_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hermansen, M.
Corresponding author
Hermansen, Marcia
Venue
Dreams
Published
2001
Pages
73-91
OpenAlex
W2484700518
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
Keywords
dreams, dream interpretation, Islamic hermeneutics, Islamic tradition, dreamers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review