CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsLegal processes and jurisprudencePhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Verifiability

Waismann, F.·1968·How I See Philosophy
DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Mr MacKinnon’s paper 1 raises a number of important questions. In the short time that is at my disposal I can only focus on two or three of them, and this merely in a sketchy way. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. D. M. MacKinnon, Proc. Aris. Soc., Suppl. vol. XIX (1945), pp. 101–18.
  2. See Karl Popper, Logik der Forschung, Vienna, 1935; translated as The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London, 1959.
  3. See, for instance, J. V. Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quanten-mechanik, Berlin, 1932; translated as Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton, 1955.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Waismann, F.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Waismann, F.
Venue
How I See Philosophy
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
1968
Pages
39-66
DOI
10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_2
OpenAlex
W4254257841
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
verifiability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Verifiability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_2
The paper
Waismann, F. (1968). Verifiability. How I See Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_2