The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis
Abstract
Large scale comparative studies of national political systems offer the social scientist a methodology of great analytic power if only proper use can be made of the material at hand. In this article we examine in some detail a single sociological effort to apply the comparative method to national political systems. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072
A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810-1998
Vanhanen, T. (2000) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343300037002008 · Cited by 668
The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Kligemann, H.-D. (2003) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00086 · Cited by 657
Davenport, C. (1995) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111650 · Cited by 623
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace
Davenport, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510021 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutright, P.
- Venue
- Comparative Government
- Publisher
- Macmillan Education UK
- Published
- 1969
- Pages
- 29-41
- OpenAlex
- W2312487777
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 435.26
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-15318-3_5
- The paper
- Cutright, P. (1969). National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis. Comparative Government. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15318-3_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
