The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Labour Process Theory
Abstract
How are we to make sense of the way work is organised and controlled? To what extent is its design the result of technological demands, the interests of capital or processes of negotiation and struggl
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Labour process theory and the gig economy
Gandini, A. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718790002 · Cited by 946
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine
Nicolini, D. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0556 · Cited by 451
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Contu, A. (2008) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318907310941 · Cited by 335
Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job
Fleming, P. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618765568 · Cited by 297
Rethinking Management and Managerial Work: Capitalism, Control, and Subjectivity
Willmott, H. (1997) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679705001101 · Cited by 157
Self-citationFollow the Redbrick Road: Reflections on Pathways in and out of the Labor Process Debate
Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2000) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2000.11656799 · Cited by 99
The New ‘Hidden Abode’: Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Economy
Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02071.x · Cited by 96
Bloom, P., & Śliwa, M. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726721996763 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1990
- OpenAlex
- W2086110604
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
