The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quasi-Markets and Social Policy
Abstract
Fundamental change is taking place in the provision of welfare services in Britain. Government bureaucracies are losing their monopoly in such key areas as health, housing, community care and educatio
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074012466935 · Cited by 848
Deem, R. (1998) · International Studies in Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/0962021980020014 · Cited by 802
DEEM, R. (2001) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050060020020408 · Cited by 666
‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship
Nicholls, A. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008 · Cited by 560
Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms
Cooper, Z., Gibbons, S., Jones, S., & McGuire, A. (2011) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1993
- OpenAlex
- W2132548373
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 69.87
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7
- The paper
- Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. (1993). Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
