The DOI matches its Crossref record.
City, Class and Power
Abstract
Urban problems are increasingly at the heart of political debate in industrial capitalist societies. The Italian Left obtained a majority in the 1975 municipal elections in all the large towns, in part on the basis of urban protests and partly on the strength of being an alternative form of local government. The same phenomenon occurred in Japan, where socialists and communists, because they have given priority to urban and environmental issues, govern the most important cities. In the United States, the crisis of New York is only the most spectacular manifestation of a series of social contradictions which question a model of urban development which nevertheless remains indispensable for the organisation of an existence centred around the dominant interests of American society. In France, urban and regional policies are one of the clearest indicators of the cleavages and struggles between different political forces, as could be observed during the debate on the Galley Bill (which in 1975 tried to tax more heavily speculative use of land and triggered widespread opposition from the business circles), or yet still, in the successive measures which have been adopted with respect to public transport and urban-renewal programmes. The middle classes are living increasingly in the grands ensembles and some observers have gone as far as to attribute the success of the Left in the 1976 district elections to their dissatisfaction with the lifestyle in these new residential milieux. As we shall see, this process is in fact more complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x · Cited by 1,214
Buechler, S. M. (1995) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00447.x · Cited by 566
Ecologies of Social Movements: Student Mobilization during the 1989 Prodemocracy Movement in Beijing
Zhao, D. (1998) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231399 · Cited by 351
The New Mega‐Projects: Genesis and Impacts
ORUETA, F. D., & FAINSTEIN, S. S. (2008) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00829.x · Cited by 261
Environmentalization: Origins, Processes, and Implications for Rural Social Change1
Buttel, F. H. (1992) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00454.x · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Castells, M.
- Publisher
- Macmillan Education UK
- Published
- 1978
- Pages
- 167-173
- OpenAlex
- W2109456331
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: City, Class and Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-27923-4
- The paper
- Castells, M. (1978). City, Class and Power. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27923-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.