Cited by 80Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLanguage, Communication, and Linguistic StudiesLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The Process of Communication Accommodation

Giles, Howard·2009·The New Sociolinguistics Reader

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_19

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To ensure compliance, fraudsters need to mitigate, normalise, or otherwise hide concerning requests within the romance through reducing social and communicative differences.

    “However, to ensure compliance, fraudsters need to mitigate, normalise, or otherwise hide concerning requests within the romance through reducing 'social and communicative differences' (Giles 2009: 278).”

    From The Language of Romance Crimes (2024) · cites this paper as Giles 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giles, H.
Corresponding author
Giles, Howard
Venue
The New Sociolinguistics Reader
Published
2009
Pages
276-286
OpenAlex
W2608993917
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.40
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
communication accommodation, communication accommodation theory, interpersonal communication, facework, self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review