Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DCE was designed and implemented following recommended guidelines.
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 157 · Cited by 765
- Authors
- Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- ORCID
- Mandy Ryan
- Venue
- The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2008
- ISSN
- 1571-487X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1541394746
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Economics of non-market goods and resources (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, willingness to pay, health care demand, non-market valuation, health policy, labor supply, time preference, demand forecasting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review