The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Motivation to have Children in Europe
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the second PPAS (carried out in 2003), between 2 and 35 percent of respondents stated that they would probably decide to have a(nother) child.
“The analysis of the data from the second PPAS (carried out in 2003) revealed that between 2 to 35 percent of respondents stated that they would probably decide to have a(nother) child (Fokkema and Esveldt 2008).”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Fokkema and Esveldt 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections
Gauthier, A. H., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2025) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12691 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Fokkema, T., & Esveldt, I.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NL)
- ORCID
- Fokkema, Tineke
- Venue
- European Studies of Population
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 141-155
- ISSN
- 1381-3579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W161725333
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European studies of population (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- attitudes toward parenthood, value of children, fertility intentions, low fertility, childlessness, religiosity, fertility preferences, transition to parenthood, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
