Cited by 240Science Education and PedagogyChemistry Education and ResearchVarious Chemistry Research Topics

Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education

Gilbert, John K., Treagust, David F.·2009·Models and Modeling in Science Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 240

Authors
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F.
Affiliations
  • LIRA - Laboratoire d'instrumentation et de recherche en astrophysique (FR)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, John K.
Venue
Models and Modeling in Science Education
Published
2009
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1871-2983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W140564096
Cited by
240
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
27.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Models and modeling in science education (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
Keywords
macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations, chemical literacy, scientific literacy, chemistry education, representation models, public understanding of chemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review