Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Assessment of the Cultural Practices Behind the Formation (or Not) of Amazonian Dark Earths in Marajo Island Archaeological Sites

Schaan, DP, Kern, DC, Frazão, FJL·2008·Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-9031-8_6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terra pretas occur at most of the major archaeological sites in the interior forests, including the Central Amazon Project, Santarem, Marajo and the Upper Xingu.

    “They occur at most of the major archaeological sites in the interior forests including the Central Amazon Project [4,23], Santarem [28], Marajo [29] and the Upper Xingu [19,30] (figure 1).”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [29]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Balée W (1989) The culture of Amazonian forests. In: Posey DA, Balée W (eds) Resource man agement in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, New York, 7:1–21
  2. Ball JW, Kelsay RG (1992) Prehistoric intrasettlement land use and residual soil P levels in the upper Belize Valley, Central America. In: Killion TW (ed) Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL/London
  3. Collins ME, Shapiro G (1987) Comparison of human influenced and natural soils at the San Luis Archaeological site, Florida. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51:171–176 · DOI
  4. DeBoer WR and Donald W. Lathrap (1979) The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceram ics. In: Kramer C (ed) Ethnoarchaeology: The Implications of Ethnology for Archaeology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 102–138
  5. Deetz J, Dethlefsen E (1963) Soil pH as a toll in archaeological site interpretation. American Antiquity 29:242–43 · DOI
  6. Eidt RC (1985) Theoretical and practical considerations in the analysis of anthrosols. In: Archaeological Geology. Yale University Press, New Haven/London
  7. Griffith M (1980) A pedological investigation of an archaeological site in Ontario, Canada: use of chemical data to discriminate features of the Benson site. Geoderma 25:27–34 · DOI
  8. Kern DC, Kampf N (1989) Antigos assentamentos indígenas na formação de solos com Terra Preta Arqueológica na Região de Oriximiná, Pará. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 13:219–25
  9. Kern DC, d'Aquino G, Rodrigues TE, Frazão FJ, Sombroek W, Myers T, Neves E (2004) Distribution of Amazonian Dark Earths in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–75 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lemos A, Santos PB (1984) Manual de descrição e coleta de solos em campo. SBCS/SNLCS, Campinhas
  11. Manzanilla L, Barba L (1990) The study of activities in classic households. Two case studies from Coba and Teotiahuacan. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:41–49 · DOI
  12. McCann JM, Woods WI, Meyer DW (2000) Organic matter and anthrosols in Amazonia: Interpreting the amerindian legacy. Paper presented at the British Society of Soil Science Proceedings, London
  13. Meggers BJ Danon J (1988) Identification and implications of a hiatus in the archeological sequence on Marajo Island, Brazil. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences 78(3):245–53
  14. Meggers BJ, Evans C (1957) Archeological Investigations at the Mouth of the Amazon Bulletin 167. U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology
  15. Roosevelt AC (1991) Moundbuilders of the Amazon: Geophysical Archaeology on Marajo Island, Brazil. Academic, San Diego, CA
  16. Roosevelt AC (1999) The development of prehistoric complex societies: Amazonia: a tropical forest. In: Bacus EA, Lecero LJ (eds) Complex Polities in the Ancient Tropical World, pp 13–33 · DOI
  17. Schaan DP (1999) Evidências para a permanência da Cultura Marajoara à época do contato europeu. Revista de Arqueologia 12–13:23–42
  18. Schaan DP (2004) The Camutins Chiefdom: Rise and Development of Complex Societies on Marajó Island, Brazilian Amazon. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
  19. Simões MF (1969) The Castanheira site: new evidence on the antiquity and history of the Ananatuba phase (Marajó Island, Brazil). American Antiquity 34(4):402–410 · DOI
  20. Sjoberg A (1976) P analysis of anthropic soil. Journal of Field Archaeology 3:448–454 · DOI
  21. Smith, Nigel (1980) Anthrosols and human carrying capacity in Amazonia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 70(4):553–566 · DOI
  22. Sokoloff VP, Carter GF (1952) Time and trace metals in archaeological sites. Science 116:1–5 · DOI
  23. Sombroek WG (1966) Amazon Soils. A Reconnaissance of the Soils of the Brazilian Amazon Region. Centre for Agricultural Publication and Documentation, Wageningen
  24. Steward JH (1948) The tropical forest tribes. In: Steward J (ed) Handbook of South American Indians. Smithsonian Institution. Bureau of American Ethnology. Bulletin 143, Washington, DC, v 3
  25. Verwe N, Stein PH (1972) Soil chemistry of post molds and rodent burrows: identification without excavation. American Antiquity 37:245–254 · DOI
  26. Woods WI (1984) Soil Chemical Investigations in Illinois Archaeology: Two Example Studies. American Chemical Society (Advances in Chemistry Series), Washington, DC, pp 67–77
  27. Woods WI, McCann JM (1999) The Anthropogenic Origin and Persistence of Amazonian Dark Earths. Yearbook, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 25:7–14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schaan, D., Kern, D., & Frazão, F.
Venue
Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision
Published
2008
Pages
127-141
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review