Multi-level Governance and Natural Resource Management: The Challenges of Complexity, Diversity, and Uncertainty
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deliberation and learning have been posited as processes that support a governance system's adaptive capacity.
“In the commons literature, deliberation and learning have been posited as processes that support a governance system's adaptive capacity (see Berkes, 2010; Blomquist, 2009; Folke et al., 2005; Gelcich, 2014).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Blomquist, 2009
The claim that polycentric governance systems provide good institutional fit for natural resource systems is partly based on the concept of 'near decomposability'.
“The claim that polycentric governance systems provide good institutional fit for natural resource systems is partly based on the concept of 'near decomposability' (Blomquist, 2009).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Blomquist, 2009
The partial independence of each subsystem implies that a governance configuration capable of producing good institutional fit would include decision makers at the level of each subsystem to make context-specific institutions as well as decision makers with authority over the entire natural resource system in order to address cross-level interactions.
“The partial independence of each subsystem implies that a governance configuration capable of producing good institutional fit would include decision makers at the level of each subsystem to make contextspecific institutions as well as decision makers with authority over the entire natural resource system in order to address cross-level interactions (see Blomquist, 2009).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Blomquist, 2009
A governance system that is similarly heterogeneous and complex may be better suited to the task of institutional design.
“This further complicates the challenge of institutional design, and a governance system that is similarly heterogeneous and complex may be better suited to the task (Blomquist, 2009).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Blomquist, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Blomquist, W.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blomquist, William
- ORCID
- Blomquist, William
- Venue
- Institutions and Sustainability
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2009-02-05
- Pages
- 109-126
- OpenAlex
- W188209001
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- multi-level governance, natural resource management, polycentric governance, scale of governance, institutional design, complexity, diversity, uncertainty, sustainable management, human-nature relationship, adaptive governance, information gathering, deliberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
