The DOI matches its Crossref record.
South Africa: The Development of Water Law
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consequently, this policy directly impacted their access to water, confining them to arid regions with limited water resources while fertile land and water-rich areas were reserved for European settlers (Davenport 1991: 164; Kidd 2009: 88).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Kidd 2009: 88
In the citing paper
“Consequently, the National Water Act (1956 ) merged riparian rights with the state's dominus fluminis sta -tus, consolidating power and control over water in the apartheid government's hands (Kidd 2009: 92; Tewari 2009: 701).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Kidd 2009: 92
In the citing paper
“Starting from the 1950s, the rapid growth of mining, secondary industries, and population in South Africa resulted in an exponential surge in water demand (Kidd 2009: 90).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Kidd 2009: 90
In the citing paper
“Regrettably, the Act favoured white farmers and systematically excluded black people from accessing water (Kidd 2009: 92).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Kidd 2009: 92
In the citing paper
“This legislation established stringent water abstraction, allocation, and utilisation regulations, effectively centralising authority and decision-making within the state apparatus.”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Kidd 2009: 92
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bronstein, V. (2002). Drowning in the hole of the doughnut: Regulatory overbreadth, discretionary licensing and the rule of law. South African Law Journal, 119, 469–483.
- Chirwa, D. M. (2004). Privatisation of water in southern Africa: A human rights perspective. African Human Rights Law Journal, 4, 218–241.
- DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (1997).White paper on a national water policy for South Africa. Pretoria: South African Government.
- DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (2004a). National water resources strategy. Pretoria: South African Government.
- DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (2004b). Annual report. Pretoria: South African Government.
- De Wet, J. C. (1959). One hundred years of water law. Acta Juridica, 1959, 31–35.
- De Wet, J. C. (1979). Opuscula Miscellanea. Durban: Butterworth.
- Fuggle, R. F., & Rabie, M. A. (1994). Environmental management in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta & Co.
- Gibson, J. T. R. (1977). Wille's principles of South African law (7 ed.). Cape Town: Juta & Co.
- Glazewski, J. (2000). Environmental law in South Africa. Durban: Butterworths.
- Hall, C. G. (1974). Water rights in South Africa (4th ed.). Cape Town: Juta & Co.
- Kidd, M. (2004). Not a drop to drink: Disconnection of water services for non-payment and the right of access to water. South African Journal of Human Rights, 20, 119–137. · DOI
- Klug, H. (1997). Water law reform under the new Constitution. Human Rights and Constitutional Law Journal of Southern Africa, 1, 5–10.
- Lyster, R., & Lazarus, P. (1995). The problem with ground water in South African law. South African Law Journal, 112, 440–461.
- Nunes, K. D. (1975). Sources of public streams in modern South African law. Acta Juridica, 1975, 298–331.
- Ramoeli, P. (2002). The SADC protocol on shared watercourses: History and current status. In A. Turton & R. Henwood (eds.), Hydropolitics in the developing world: A southern African perspective (pp. 105–111). Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Institute.
- Scholtens, J. E. (1956). The law of property. Annual Survey of South African Law, 1956, 124–123.
- Soltau, F. (1999). Environmental justice, water rights and property. Acta Juridica, 1999, 229–253.
- Thompson, H. (2006). Water law. Cape Town: Juta & Co.
- WLRP (1996). Report to the minister of water affairs and forestry of the water law review panel, fundamental principles and objectives for a new water law in South Africa. Pretoria: South African Government.
Cited by
Kaziboni, A. (2024) · Water History · doi:10.1007/s12685-024-00339-4 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidd, M.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Kidd, Michael
- ORCID
- Kidd, Michael
- Venue
- The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 87-104
- OpenAlex
- W2118847760
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Water Resources and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- water law, water rights, riparian rights, water scarcity, water access, water legislation, water policy, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
