Growth and Development of the Nariokotome Youth, KNM-WT 15000
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A Homo erectus juvenile aged between 7.6 and 8.8 years (KNM WT 15000) shows evidence of both advanced dental development and earlier attainment of body mass and stature than is typical of modern humans of a similar age.
“A Homo erectus juvenile aged between 7.6 to 8.8 years (KNM WT 15000) shows evidence of both advanced dental development and earlier attainment of body mass and stature than is typical of modern humans of a similar age (22,27).”
From The growth pattern of Neandertals, reconstructed from a juvenile skeleton from El Sidrón (Spain) (2017) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 173 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Dean, M. C., & Smith, B. H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Smith, B. Holly
- Venue
- Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 101-120
- ISSN
- 1877-9077 (ISSN-L)
- 1877-9085
- OpenAlex
- W147054692
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 173
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 91.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vertebrate paleobiology and paleoanthroplogy series/Vertebrate paleobiology and paleoanthropology series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- Homo erectus, juvenile growth, dental maturation, life history, australopiths, Homininae, slow growth, Pleistocene extinction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review