Cited by 817Social Work Education and PracticeSocial Sciences and PoliciesSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice

Abstract

This book, by one of the leading theorists of social work, tackles a subject of crucial importance to students and practitioners alike: how social workers can enable their clients to challenge and tra

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4039-1400-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dominelli, L.
Corresponding author
Dominelli, Lena
Published
2002
OpenAlex
W1589201123
Cited by
817
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 34
FWCI
7.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
anti-oppressive practice, social work theory, oppression, client empowerment, social work practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review