Cited by 4Memory, violence, and historyHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesPolitical and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Torture, Truth, Repression and Archaeology

Haber, Alejandro F.·2009·Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology

Abstract

During the most recent military dictatorship in Argentina, torture committed in pozos (clandestine detention centers) was not only aimed at obtaining information but at getting prisoners’ self-narratives in accordance with the executioners’ rules. As a consequence, torture involved the establishment of a certain regime of truth. Although this regime was necessarily authoritarian, it did not include passive descriptions (DuBois 1990). DuBois defined torture as the ultimate domination of bodies and – above anything else – ideas. From this point of view, torture did not limit itself to the extermination of enemies. On the contrary, it tried to impose a particular interpretation of history; that is to say, a particular “truth” in the struggle for understanding. Taking into account the undeniable disparity between the number of combatants and the number of people imprisoned and tortured during the military government, DuBois’ thesis brought to the foreground the enormous social cost of establishing “truth”.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_1

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bellelli, C., and Tobin, J., 1985, Archaeology of the Desaparecidos. Society for American Archaeology Bulletin 14(2):6–7.
  2. Bianchi, S. 2008, “El Pozo” (ex Servicio de Informaciones). Un Centro Clandestino de Detención, Desaparición, Tortura y Muerte de Personas de la Ciudad de Rosario, Argentina. Antropología Política del Pasado Reciente. Prohistoria, Rosario.
  3. Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense, 1992, Excavando la Violencia: Arqueología y Derechos Humanos en el Cono Sur. In Arqueología en América Latina, Hoy, edited by G. Politis, pp. 160–166. Biblioteca del Banco Popular, Buenos Aires.
  4. Gnecco, C., 1999, Multivocalidad Histórica. Hacia una Cartografía Poscolonial de la Arqueología. Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá.
  5. Haber, A., 1995, Supuestos Teórico-Metodológicos de la Etapa Formativa de la Arqueología de Catamarca (1875–1900). Publicaciones del CIFFyH – Arqueología (1992–1994) 47:31–54.
  6. Vollet, M., 2001, La Vana Europeización de los Bárbaros. El Aspecto Autoreferencial de la Discusión Española sobre la Conquista. In Concepciones de la Conquista. Aproximaciones Interdisciplinarias, edited by F. Castaneda and M. Vollet, pp. 119–133. Uniandes, Bogotá.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Haber, A. F.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Haber, Alejandro F.
Venue
Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
Published
2009
Pages
3-8
ISSN
1574-0439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W403763741
Cited by
4
References
13
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology/Contributions to global historical archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
Keywords
torture, regimes of truth, self-narrative, state terrorism, military dictatorship, Argentine military dictatorship, clandestine detention centers, repression, Dubois, historical memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review