Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Brazilian cultural history and politicsMemory, violence, and historyHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Archaeology of Conflict in Brazil

Funari, Pedro Paulo A., de Oliveira, Nanci Vieira·2009·Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The recent history of archaeology in Brazil has been troubled. Brazilian archaeology emerged in the nineteenth century. However, it was only after World War II that it acquired academic status, especially thanks to Paulo Duarte’s initiative. The military coup in April 1964 marked a turning point for the discipline, which tended to follow French humanism inspired by Leroi-Gourhan and human rights respect. From that moment on, the country suffered at the hands of an increasingly repressive regime. At first, many politicians, trade union leaders and intellectuals were dismissed. Finally, political violence gave way to the Ato Institucional N° 5 (Institutional Act Number 5)1 (1968), military government (1969), and the exile, detention and murder of political opponents. In 1964, the political alliance between the United States and Brazil encouraged the creation of a Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas (National Program of Archaeological Research) with headquarters in Washington. In 1969, the promotion of pro-government researchers proved to be connected with the dismissal of critical thinkers such as Paulo Duarte and the intention to destroy the Instituto de Pré-História da Universidade de São Paulo (Institute of Prehistory of the University of Sao Paulo – Duarte 1994).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Duarte, P., 1970, Fontes de Pesquisa Pré-Histórica. In Estudos de Pré-História Geral e Brasileira, edited by F. Olympio da Fonseca, pp. 374–442. Instituto de Pré-História, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.
  2. Duarte, P., 1994, Paulo Duarte e o Instituto de Pré-História. Idéias 1(1):155–179.
  3. Funari, P., 2003b, História, Contradições e Conflitos. In Marxismo e Ciências Humanas, edited by A. Galvão et al., pp. 101–106. Ed. Xamã-Cemarx-FAPESP, Sao Paulo.
  4. Oliveira, N., 2004, Arqueología e Historia: Estúdio de um Poblado Jesuítico em Rio de Janeiro. In Arqueologia Histórica en América del Sur; Los Desafíos del Siglo XXI, edited by P. Funari and A. Zarankin, pp. 73–91. Uniandes, Bogotá.

Cited by

See all 4

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Funari, P. P. A., & de Oliveira, N. V.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Funari, Pedro Paulo A.
Venue
Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2009
Pages
25-31
ISSN
1574-0439 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_3
OpenAlex
W2208572756
Semantic Scholar
a6fd0aa012e424f875f4cfd965909f81a28a81c6
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology/Contributions to global historical archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Keywords
military dictatorship, Institutional Act No. 5, academic freedom, political violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review