Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The broader incorporation of the constructionist approach to gender in psychology happened in the late 1960s and 1970s and is most closely related with second-wave feminist theory and activism.
“Although the impact of the social was recognized in some of the early studies (for instance, Money ' s previously described account of gender), the broader incorporation of the constructionist approach to gender in psychology that happened in the late 1960s and 1970s is most closely related with the second-wave feminist theory and activism (Chrisler and McCreary, 2010).”
From Gender: Gendering of Categories (2015) · cites this paper as Chrisler and McCreary, 2010
Drawing on insights from feminist critique of science, feminist psychologists raised awareness of how numerous studies used restricted samples in their research designs.
“Drawing on insights from feminist critique of science (Burr, 1998: p. 132; Chrisler and McCreary, 2010), they raised the awareness on how numerous studies used restricted samples in their research designs.”
From Gender: Gendering of Categories (2015) · cites this paper as Chrisler and McCreary, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 127 · Cited by 329
- Authors
- Chrisler, J. C., & McCreary, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Connecticut College (US)
- ORCID
- Donald R. McCreary
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W2501251056
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 42.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- gender studies, sex differences, history of gender studies, gender roles, gender identity, gender stereotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
