Cited by 244Usability and User Interface DesignDesign Education and PracticeDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Inclusive Design

P. John Clarkson, Simeon Keates, Dong, Hua·2003·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarkson, P. J., Keates, S., & Dong, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Royal College of Art (GB)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2003
OpenAlex
W4249510007
Cited by
244
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.91
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
inclusive design, accessibility, product design, user needs, legal and ethical considerations, design strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review