The Jackknife and Bootstrap
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fail-safe N analysis was complemented by a jackknife analysis to cross-validate that the observed results were not driven by any single study in the dataset.
“The fail-safe N analysis was complemented by a jackknife analysis to cross-validate that the observed results were not driven by any single study in the dataset (Amanzio et al., 2013; Shao & Tu, 1995).”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Shao & Tu, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 1,985
- Authors
- Shao, J., & Tu, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Springer Series in Statistics
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 1995
- ISSN
- 0172-7397 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327088997
- Cited by
- 1,985
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer series in statistics (publishedVersion)
- International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- jackknife, bootstrapping, resampling, data resampling, statistical inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
