The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonlinear Programming
Abstract
As we discussed in Chapter 4, in linear programming (LP) applications, our purpose is to optimize (i.e., maximize or minimize) a linear objective function subject to linear constraints. Although a large number of practical decision problems can be accurately modeled as linear programs, it should be emphasized that in some cases using LP to formulate an inherently nonlinear decision problem (i.e., forcing the world to fit the model) may not provide an accurate representation of reality. In many OR problems due to economies/diseconomies of scale (e.g., quantity discounts), interaction among decision variables (e.g., variance of a portfolio) or transformations that result in nonlinearities (e.g., a linear stochastic programming formulation transformed into an equivalent nonlinear deterministic one), an LP formulation becomes impossible to use. In these cases, we would need to utilize the techniques of nonlinear programming (NLP) that can deal with both nonlinear objective functions and nonlinear constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Online dictionary learning for sparse coding
Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., & Sapiro, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553463 · Cited by 2,114
Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Riemann manifold langevin and hamiltonian monte carlo methods
Girolami, M., & Calderhead, B. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · Cited by 1,473
Single-Cell Multi-omic Integration Compares and Contrasts Features of Brain Cell Identity
Welch, J. D., Kozareva, V., Ferreira, A., Vanderburg, C., Martin, C., & Macosko, E. Z. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.006 · Cited by 1,193
Sayed, A. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2306253 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Parlar, M.
- Venue
- Interactive Operations Research with Maple
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Boston
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 153-191
- OpenAlex
- W4242209908
- Cited by
- 1,741
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4612-1356-7_5
- The paper
- Parlar, M. (2000). Nonlinear Programming. Interactive Operations Research with Maple. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1356-7_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.