Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,741

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nonlinear Programming

Parlar, Mahmut·2000·Interactive Operations Research with Maple

Abstract

As we discussed in Chapter 4, in linear programming (LP) applications, our purpose is to optimize (i.e., maximize or minimize) a linear objective function subject to linear constraints. Although a large number of practical decision problems can be accurately modeled as linear programs, it should be emphasized that in some cases using LP to formulate an inherently nonlinear decision problem (i.e., forcing the world to fit the model) may not provide an accurate representation of reality. In many OR problems due to economies/diseconomies of scale (e.g., quantity discounts), interaction among decision variables (e.g., variance of a portfolio) or transformations that result in nonlinearities (e.g., a linear stochastic programming formulation transformed into an equivalent nonlinear deterministic one), an LP formulation becomes impossible to use. In these cases, we would need to utilize the techniques of nonlinear programming (NLP) that can deal with both nonlinear objective functions and nonlinear constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-1356-7_5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,741

Metadata

Authors
Parlar, M.
Venue
Interactive Operations Research with Maple
Published
2000
Pages
153-191
OpenAlex
W4242209908
Cited by
1,741
References
0
FWCI
25.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4612-1356-7_5
The paper
Parlar, M. (2000). Nonlinear Programming. Interactive Operations Research with Maple. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1356-7_5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.