The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remineralization and Nutrient Cycling in Coastal Marine Ecosystems
Abstract
Our views of remineralization and nutrient cycling in coastal marine ecosystems have changed considerably over the last 30 years. The major trend has been an increasing appreciation for the complexity of processes involved, including some marked changes in our assessment of the importance of bacteria with respect to smaller animals and in our perception of the association between bacteria and particulate matter in the sea. Among the more recent developments in this area is a growing awareness of the importance of the coupling between benthic and pelagic communities in coastal waters. There appears to be a strong linear correlation between the organic matter produced in the overlying water and the amount of organic matter consumed on the bottom in almost all of the coastal environments for which annual data are available. The large amount of organic matter consumed by the benthos (perhaps 25–50 percent of that produced) is associated with a large flux of inorganic nutrients from the sediments to the overlying water. The stoichiometry of net benthic nutrient regeneration differs from that of pelagic regeneration, however, and simple Redfield type models probably cannot be applied. The amount of fixed inorganic nitrogen returned to the water across the sediment-water interface appears to be about half of that expected on the basis of the flux of phosphorus. This behavior, along with the fact that an appreciable amount of organic matter in coastal waters gets remineralized on the bottom, contributes to the low N/P ratio that is characteristic of these areas and may be responsible for the observation that nitrogen is commonly the nutrient most limiting for primary production. Recent direct measurements of the flux of dissolved N 2 across the sediment-water interface indicate that denitrification is probably responsible for the loss of fixed nitrogen during decomposition in the sediments. If this is a widespread phenomenon, estuaries, bays, and other coastal waters may be major sinks in the marine nitrogen cycle and important terms in the global nitrogen budget. However, the fact that eutrophication appears to be an increasing problem in many estuaries is dramatic warning that anthropogenic nutrient inputs can overwhelm the recycling and remineralization processes in coastal waters. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ruttenberg, K. C. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/08153-6 · Cited by 541
Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: Implications for nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters
Paerl, H. W., Dennis, R. L., & Whitall, D. R. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804899 · Cited by 295
The Impacts of Pulsed Reintroduction of River Water on a Mississippi Delta Coastal Basin
Day, J. W., Cable, J. E., Cowan, J. H., DeLaune, R., de Mutsert, K., Fry, B., Mashriqui, H., Justic, D., Kemp, P., Lane, R. R., et al. (2009) · Journal of Coastal Research · doi:10.2112/si54-015.1 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Nixon, S. W.
- Venue
- Estuaries and Nutrients
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 1981
- Pages
- 111-138
- OpenAlex
- W2213904111
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remineralization and Nutrient Cycling in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4612-5826-1_6
- The paper
- Nixon, S. W. (1981). Remineralization and Nutrient Cycling in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. Estuaries and Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5826-1_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.