The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems
Merkle, R. C. (1980) · 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.1980.10006 · Cited by 1,418
Cited by
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
Lightweight blockchain for healthcare
Ismail, L., Materwala, H., & Zeadally, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2947613 · Cited by 260
Bibliometrics-based evaluation of the Blockchain research trend: 2008–march 2017
Miau, S., & Yang, J.-M. (2018) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1434138 · Cited by 141
A review on blockchain technology and blockchain projects fostering open science
Leible, S., Schlager, S., Schubotz, M., & Gipp, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016 · Cited by 134
Jafar, U., Ab Aziz, M. J., Shukur, Z., & Hussain, H. A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22197585 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayer, D., Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S.
- Venue
- Sequences II
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 329-334
- OpenAlex
- W1572490578
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4613-9323-8_24
- The paper
- Bayer, D., Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1993). Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping. Sequences II. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9323-8_24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
