Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Archaeology Dreaming: Postapartheid Urban Imaginaries and the Remains of the Prestwich Street Dead

Shepherd, Nick·2011·New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0341-8_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-0341-8_12

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gosling, M., 2005, UCT students exasperated as SAHRA blocks bones study. In Cape Times, Cape Town.
  2. HOC, 2003, Substantiation of Appeal Submitted by the Hands Off Prestwich Street Ad Hoc Committee, Hands Off Prestwich Street ad hoc committee, Cape Town.
  3. PPPC, 2003, Submission to DAC Tribunal, Prestwich Place Project Committee, Cape Town.
  4. SAHRA, 2003b, Permit No. 80/03/06/001/51 issued by the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) Archaeology, Palaeontology, Meteorites and Heritage Objects Permit Committee to T.J.G. Hart of the Archaeology Contracts Office, University of Cape Town, pp. 1–4. Cape Town.
  5. Sato, K., 2006, The Site of Memory, the Site of Things: Against Identity Politics. Paper presented at World Archaeological Congress Inter-Congress Osaka. Osaka.
  6. Sealy, J., 2003, A Proposal for the Future of the Prestwich Street Remains, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Shepherd, N.
Venue
New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2011
Pages
155-166
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-0341-8_12
Cited by
2
References
18
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.