Cited by 37Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy and History of ScienceVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The Construction of Visual Reality

Hoffman, Donald D.·2012·Hallucinations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-0959-5_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 16 · Cited by 37

Authors
Hoffman, D. D.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Donald D.
Venue
Hallucinations
Published
2011-11-16
Pages
7-15
OpenAlex
W230042664
Cited by
37
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
illusion, hallucinations, perception, evolutionary game theory, adaptive behavior, visual reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review