CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Classroom Strategies to Enhance Academic Engaged Time

Gettinger, Maribeth, Walter, Martha J.·2012·Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic engaged time predicts academic achievement, and engagement is directly related to learning outcomes.

    “Gettinger and Walter (2012), based on research in U.S. schools, claimed that 'academic engaged time,' that is, the amount of time students are actively involved, predicts academic achievement, and engagement is directly related to learning outcomes (see also Fredricks et al., 2004).”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Gettinger and Walter (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Gettinger, Maribeth
ORCID
Walter, Martha J.
Venue
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
Pages
653-673
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31
OpenAlex
W90071710
Cited by
89
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.40
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
student engagement, student motivation, classroom management, instructional design, evidence-based practice, pedagogical context, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review