Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intelligent Tutoring Systems significantly enhance the performance of both students and educators.
“while also significantly enhancing the performance of both students and educators [24]”
From Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Overview of Pedagogical Integrity, Artificial Intelligence Literacy, and Policy Integration (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 1,475
- Authors
- Spector, J. M., Merrill, M., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W2111041495
- Cited by
- 1,475
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 89.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- educational communication, educational technology, information and communication technology in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
