Computational Models of Hallucinations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LSD induces more visual hallucinations, a phenomenon that can be captured by circular inferences.
“Thus, LSD induces more visual hallucinations, a phenomenon that can be captured by circular inferences.121”
From Are hallucinations due to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory influences on the brain? (2016) · cites this paper as [121]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 119 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Jardri, R., & Denève, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Denève, Sophie
- Venue
- The Neuroscience of Hallucinations
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2012-07-28
- Pages
- 289-313
- OpenAlex
- W2173656965
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- hallucinations, schizophrenia, positive symptoms, computational models of the brain, artificial neural networks, neurodynamics, noise, Bayesian model, subjective experience, consciousness, neural architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
