Cited by 8Disability Rights and RepresentationAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Theoretical Models and Autism

Chown, Nick, Beardon, Luke·2017·Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102171-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Chown, N., & Beardon, L.
Affiliations
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Chown, Nick
Venue
Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published
2017
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W3033269643
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, medical model of disability, social model of disability, biopsychosocial model, person-first language, Ian Hacking, autistic adults, disability terminology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review